文章摘要
伏诺拉生二联与三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效对比
Comparison of the efficacy of vonoprazan dual therapy and triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication
投稿时间:2025-11-18  修订日期:2026-06-11
DOI:
中文关键词: 幽门螺杆菌  伏诺拉生  治疗
英文关键词: Helicobacter pylori  Vonoprazan  Treatment
基金项目:深圳市科技创新委员会(JCYJ20230807113503006);深圳市科技计划项目(LCYSSQ20220823091405012)
作者单位邮编
高奕德 香港大学深圳医院消化及肝脏科深圳大学医学部 518053;518060
倪丽 香港大学深圳医院消化及肝脏科 
邓子杰 香港大学深圳医院消化及肝脏科 
韩少伟 香港大学深圳医院药学部 
曹欣宇 香港大学深圳医院消化及肝脏科深圳大学医学部 
吕涛* 香港大学深圳医院消化及肝脏科 518053
摘要点击次数: 112
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 对比伏诺拉生(VPZ)二联疗法与加用克拉霉素后的VPZ三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌(Hp)初次感染患者的疗效、不良反应及治疗依从性。方法 采用前瞻性随机对照研究设计,选择2022年3月至2023年8月于香港大学深圳医院消化及肝脏科门诊就诊的Hp感染初次治疗患者198例,根据随机数字表法随机分为VPZ二联组(n=100)和VPZ三联组(n=98)。对比两组患者的Hp根除率、不良反应发生率以及良好治疗依从性。结果 意向性治疗(ITT)分析中,与VPZ三联组比较,VPZ二联组Hp根除率升高(96.0%比95.9%),非劣效性检验结果显示其达到预设非劣效性标准(P<0.025)。修正ITT(MITT)分析中,与VPZ三联组比较,VPZ二联组Hp根除率升高(97.0%比96.9%),非劣效性检验结果显示其达到预设非劣效性标准(P<0.025)。符合方案集(PP)分析中,与VPZ三联组比较,VPZ二联组Hp根除率未降低(96.7%比96.7%),非劣效性检验结果显示其达到预设非劣效性标准(P<0.025)。与VPZ三联组比较,VPZ二联组不良反应发生率降低(39.0%比56.1%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与VPZ三联组比较,VPZ二联组良好治疗依从性降低(95.0%比95.9%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 对于初治Hp感染患者,VPZ二联组根除率非劣效于VPZ三联组,且有着较低的不良反应和较少的抗生素使用,故VPZ二联疗法更应推荐作为Hp感染初治患者的一线治疗。
英文摘要:
      Objective To compare the efficacy, incidence of adverse reactions, and treatment compliance of vonoprazan-dual therapy with vonoprazan-triple therapy containing clarithromycin for the treatment-naive Helicobacter pylori infection. Methods A single-centre randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Outpatients from Gastroenterology Department at the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital from March 2022 to August 2023. A total of 198 patients were randomly assigned to the vonoprazan-dual grou(n=100) or vonoprazan-triple group(n=98) by a random number table. The Helicobacter pylori eradication rate, incidence of adverse reactions, and good treatment compliance were compared between the two groups after follow-up. Results Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed that compared with the vonoprazan triple therapy group, the vonoprazan dual therapy group had a higher Helicobacter pylori eradication rate (96.0%vs95.9%), the non-inferiority test showed that it met the prespecified non-inferiority standard (P<0.025). Modified ITT (MITT) analysis showed that compared with the vonoprazan triple therapy group, the vonoprazan dual therapy group had a higher Helicobacter pylori eradication rate (97.0%vs96.9%), the non-inferiority test showed that it met the prespecified non-inferiority standard (P<0.025). Per-protocol (PP) analysis showed that compared with the vonoprazan triple therapy group, the vonoprazan dual therapy group did not have a lower eradication rate (96.7%vs96.7%), the non-inferiority test showed that it met the prespecified non-inferiority standard (P<0.025). Compared with the vonoprazan triple therapy group, the vonoprazan dual therapy group had a lower incidence of adverse reactions (39.0%vs56.1%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Compared with the vonoprazan triple therapy group, the vonoprazan dual therapy group had a lower good treatment compliance (95.0%vs95.9%), and the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion For treatment-naive patients with Helicobacter pylori infection, vonoprazan-dual therapy demonstrated non-inferior eradication rate compared with vonoprazan-triple therapy, with a lower rate of adverse reaction and reduced antibiotic use. Therefore, vonoprazan-dual therapy is more recommended as the first-line treatment for treatment-naive patients.
View Fulltext   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭