文章摘要
IMRT与SIB-SBRT治疗大体积晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效比较研究
Clinical comparative study of IMRT and SIB-SBRT in the treatment of massive advanced non-small cell lung cancer
投稿时间:2025-05-30  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2026.07.004
中文关键词: 调强放疗  同步加量调强放疗  晚期非小细胞肺癌  放射
英文关键词: Intensity modulated radiotherapy  Synchronous dose intensity modulated radiotherapy  Advanced non-small cell lung cancer  Radiate
基金项目:2022年江苏省卫健委医学科研面上项目(编号:M2022051); 2023年度常州市卫健委科技项目(编号:ZD202325); 2024年度常州市“十四五”卫生健康高层次人才培养工程(编号:2024CZBJ022)
作者单位E-mail
陈玲 213000 江苏常州 常州市肿瘤医院肿瘤放疗科  
刘俊 213000 江苏常州 常州市肿瘤医院肿瘤放疗科  
吉文晶 213000 江苏常州 常州市肿瘤医院肿瘤放疗科  
赵一儒 213000 江苏常州 常州市肿瘤医院肿瘤放疗科  
马立 213000 江苏常州 常州市肿瘤医院肿瘤放疗科  
孙蕊蕊 213000 江苏常州 常州市肿瘤医院肿瘤放疗科  
戴科军 213000 江苏常州 常州市肿瘤医院肿瘤放疗科 yhdaxx520@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 247
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 分析调强放疗(IMRT)与同步加量调强放疗(SIB-SBRT)治疗大体积晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的临床价值。方法 回顾性分析2022年1月至2024年12月在常州市肿瘤医院肿瘤放疗科接受放射治疗的肿瘤直径>5 cm的60例晚期NSCLC患者临床资料,其中,接受IMRT治疗的患者为IMRT组(n=27),接受SIB-SBRT治疗的患者为SIB-SBRT组(n=33)。比较两组患者计划靶区(PTV)、肿瘤靶区(GTVboost)、均匀性指数(HI)、适形性指数(CI)、靶区覆盖度(TC)、PTV及GTVboost生物效应剂量(PTVBED、GTVboost-BED)、脊髓最大剂量、双肺V5V20V30、双肺平均剂量、心脏V30V40、心脏平均剂量差异。结果 与IMRT组比较,SIBSBRT组GTVboost指标升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者TC比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);SIB-SBRT组CI、HI低于IMRT组,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与IMRT组比较,SIB-SBRT组GTVboost-BED指标升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与IMRT组比较,SIB-SBRT组脊髓最大剂量、双肺V5、双肺平均剂量、心脏平均剂量降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 针对肿瘤直径>5 cm晚期NSCLC患者,SIB-SBRT显著提高GTVboost区域的剂量和生物效应剂量,并且在减少正常组织的辐射剂量(尤其是肺V5和心脏的平均剂量)方面优势明显。
英文摘要:
      Objective To analyze the clinical value of intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) and simultaneous intensitymodulated radiotherapy(SIB-SBRT) in the treatment of massive advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). Methods The clinical data of 60 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer whose tumor diameter was more than 5 cm and who received radiotherapy from January 2022 to December 2024 in Changzhou Cancer Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, the patients who received IMRT were IMRT group(n=27) and those who received SIB-SBRT treatment were SIB-SBRT group(n=33). The planned target area(PTV), gross tumor volume(GTVboost), uniformity index(HI), conformability index(CI), target coverage(TC), biological effect doses of PTV and GTVboost(PTVBED, GTVboost-BED), maximum dose of spinal cord, V5, V20, V30, bilateral lungs were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with IMRT group, the index of GTVboost in SIB-SBRT group increased, and the difference was statistically significant(P< 0.05). Compared with TC in two groups, the difference was not statistically significant(P> 0.05). CI and HI in SIB-SBRT group were lower than those in IMRT group, with no statistical significance(P> 0.05). Compared with IMRT group, the index of GTVboost-BED in SIB-SBRT group increased, and the difference was statistically significant(P< 0.05). Compared with IMRT group, the maximum dose of spinal cord, V5 of both lungs, average dose of both lungs and average dose of heart in SIB-SBRT group decreased, and the difference was statistically significant(P< 0.05). Conclusion For patients with advanced NSCLC with tumor diameter>5 cm, SIB-SBRT can significantly increase the dose in GTVboost region and biological effect dose, and has obvious advantages in reducing the radiation dose in normal tissues(especially the average dose in lung V5 and heart).
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭