文章摘要
细菌培养状态对脓毒症患者临床结局的预测价值
The predictive value of bacterial culture status for clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis
投稿时间:2026-01-19  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2026.08.010
中文关键词: 细菌培养阴性  细菌培养阳性  脓毒症  脓毒性休克
英文关键词: Bacteria culture-negative  Bacteria culture-positive  Sepsis  Septic shock
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
刘广丽 230032 安徽合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院心血管内科  
汤文豪 230032 安徽合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院急诊医学科  
周姝 230601 安徽合肥 安徽医科大学第二附属医院急诊医学科  
卫红 237000 安徽六安 六安市人民医院急诊医学科  
翁海蓉 241001 安徽芜湖 皖南医学院第一附属医院(弋矶山医院)急诊医学科  
杨一红 236044 安徽阜阳 阜阳市人民医院急诊医学科  
季超智 236600 安徽阜阳 太和县人民医院急诊医学科  
王娟 241000 安徽芜湖 芜湖市第二人民医院急诊医学科  
笪伟 230032 安徽合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院急诊医学科 yfy153841@fy.ahmu.edu.cn 
摘要点击次数: 122
全文下载次数: 81
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨符合脓毒症-3(Sepsis-3)标准的患者中细菌培养阴性对临床结局的影响,并重点分析其在脓毒性休克亚组中的意义。方法 采用多中心回顾性队列研究,纳入2020年1月至2024年3月安徽省7家医院3 612例成年脓毒症患者为研究对象。根据入院后首次培养结果分为细菌培养阳性脓毒症组(n=2 283)和细菌培养阴性脓毒症组(n=1 329)。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)平衡混杂因素后,每组各1 329例;在脓毒性休克亚组中,经PSM后,细菌培养阳性组与阴性组各纳入864例患者。主要终点为住院全因死亡率,次要终点包括重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率、初始经验性抗生素治疗适宜率等。结果 整体匹配队列中,两组患者住院死亡率比较,差异无统计学意义(38.2%比36.3%, P=0.081)。在脓毒性休克亚组中,阴性组ICU死亡率(34.1%比28.8%, P=0.019)和住院死亡率(40.5%比30.6%, P<0.001)均高于阳性组,且初始抗生素治疗适宜率较低(69.2%比78.9%, P<0.001)。多因素logistic回归分析结果显示,在脓毒性休克患者中,细菌培养阴性是住院死亡的独立危险因素(OR=1.537, 95%CI:1.256~1.883, P<0.001)。结论 细菌培养阴性脓毒性休克患者住院死亡风险增加,可能与其初始经验性抗生素治疗适宜率较低有关,是需要特别关注的高危临床亚组。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the impact of bacteria culture-negative status on clinical outcomes in patients meeting the sepsis-3 criteria, with a focus on its significance in the septic shock subgroup. Methods A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling 3 612 adult sepsis patients from seven hospitals in Anhui province between January 2020 and March 2024. Patients were divided into a bacteria culture-positive group(n=2 283) and a bacteria culture-negative group(n=1 329) based on microbiological results. After balancing confounding factors using propensity score matching(PSM), 1 329 patients were included in each group for the primary analysis; within the septic shock subgroup, 864 patients were included in each group after PSM. The primary endpoint was in-hospital all-cause mortality, and secondary endpoints included ICU mortality, appropriateness of initial empirical antibiotic therapy, among others. Results In the overall matched cohort, no significant difference was observed in in-hospital mortality between the two groups(38.2% vs. 36.3%, P=0.081). However, in the septic shock subgroup, the culture-negative group had significantly higher ICU mortality(34.1% vs. 28.8%, P=0.019) and in-hospital mortality(40.5% vs. 30.6%, P<0.001) than the positive group, along with a lower rate of appropriate initial antibiotic therapy(69.2% vs. 78.9%, P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that bacteria culture-negative status was an independent risk factor for in-hospital death in septic shock patients(OR=1.537, 95% CI: 1.2561.883, P<0.001). Conclusion Bacteria culture-negative septic shock patients have an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, which may be associated with a lower rate of appropriate initial empirical antibiotic therapy. This subgroup represents a high-risk clinical entity requiring special attention.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭