|
两种热牙胶充填方法用于根尖诱导成形术后根管充填的比较 |
A comparative study of two warm gutta-percha obturation techniques to apexification root canals |
投稿时间:2019-05-12 修订日期:2020-01-13 |
DOI: |
中文关键词: 根尖诱导成形术 热牙胶充填 根管充填 |
英文关键词: Apexification Root canal obturation Warm gutta-percha obturation |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 535 |
全文下载次数: 0 |
中文摘要: |
目的 比较热牙胶注射充填法与热牙胶垂直加压充填法用于根尖诱导成形术后根管充填的疗效。方法 选取根尖诱导成形术完成后需行根管充填的单根管患牙44例,随机分为两组,实验组使用热牙胶注射充填法进行根充,对照组采用热牙胶垂直加压充填法进行根充,记录两组根管充填时间及治疗效果。结果 实验组有效率为100%,对照组有效率为95.5%,两组有效率相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);实验组根管充填时间短于对照组根管充填时间,两组相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 与热牙胶垂直加压充填法相比,热牙胶注射充填法用于根尖诱导成形术后根管充填具有同样的临床疗效和更高的工作效率。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of warm gutta-percha injectable technique and warm vertical condensation technique to apexification root canals.Methods 44 teeth with well apexification were chosen and divided into two groups randomly. Test group was obturated with warm gutta-percha injectable technique. Control group was obturated with warm vertical condensation technique. Then the obturation quality and the time of obturating process were recorded.Results The overall effectiveness rate in test group and control group was 100% and 95.5% and there was no statistical different between the two groups(P>0.05). Significant difference(P<0.05) was found between two groups in the time of obturating process. Conclusion Warm gutta-percha injectable technique had more effective obturation to apexification root canals. |
View Fulltext
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |