文章摘要
超薄贴面与传统贴面修复的效果比较
Comparisonof clinical effect of ultra-thinceramic veneers and porcelain laminate veneers
投稿时间:2016-09-06  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2017.03.003
中文关键词: 超薄不备牙贴面  传统备牙贴面  前牙区  临床评价
英文关键词: Ultra-thin ceramic veneers  Porcelain laminate veneers  Anterior teeth area  Clinical evaluation
基金项目:安徽高校省级自然科学研究项目(项目编号:KJ2014A121)
作者单位E-mail
谢小婷 230032 合肥 安徽医科大学口腔医学院  
唐旭炎 230032 合肥 安徽医科大学口腔医学院 txy8302@hotmail.com 
曹颖 230032 合肥 安徽医科大学口腔医学院  
刘世明 230032 合肥 安徽医科大学口腔医学院  
摘要点击次数: 1802
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 比较超薄贴面与传统贴面修复的短期临床效果。方法 选择2014年7月至2015年7月在安徽医科大学口腔医学院进行贴面修复的34例患者,共111个修复贴面,将采用超薄贴面的54例修复体作为试验组,传统贴面的57例修复体作为对照组。贴面修复1年后复查,由贴面修复医师对基牙敏感性、继发龋、牙龈情况及贴面颜色、边缘密合性、边际着色情况进行检查,对两组复查结果进行比较分析。结果 试验组和对照组继发龋、术后敏感、边缘着色均为A级,颜色满意度、边缘密合性和牙龈反应为A级或B级,两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 超薄贴面修复的短期临床效果不亚于传统贴面修复。
英文摘要:
      Objective To compare the clinical results of ultra-thin ceramic veneers and porcelain laminate veneers. Methods After one year of the operation, we reviewed 34 patients with 111 restorations in the region of anterior tooth, who were treated in the stomatological Hospital of Anhui Medical University from July 2014 to July 2015, including 54 ultra-thin veneers and 57 porcelain laminate veneers. We recorded the postoperative sensitivity, caries and gingival reaction of the teeth, the color match, marginal discoloration and marginal adaptation of the veneers, and analysed the results between the two groups. All the examinationwas performed by only one doctor. Results The caries, postoperative sensitivity and marginal discoloration were in grade A, the color match, marginal adaptation and gingival reaction of the two groups were in grade A or B, and there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). Conclusion The ultra-thin ceramic veneers have no worse clinical effect than porcelain laminate veneersin a short-term period of time.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭