文章摘要
右美托咪定或咪达唑仑复合0.375%左旋布比卡因对超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞效果比较
Comparison of adding dexmedetomidine or midazolam to 0.375% levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block
投稿时间:2017-02-04  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2017.12.008
中文关键词: 右美托咪定  咪达唑仑  左旋布比卡因  臂丛神经阻滞  超声
英文关键词: Dexmedetomidine  Midazolam  Levobupivacaine  Brachial plexus block  Ultrasound
基金项目:
作者单位
陈海涛 234011 安徽宿州 皖北煤电集团总医院麻醉科 
刘玉 234011 安徽宿州 皖北煤电集团总医院麻醉科 
刘绍正 234011 安徽宿州 皖北煤电集团总医院麻醉科 
王先锋 234011 安徽宿州 皖北煤电集团总医院麻醉科 
摘要点击次数: 1584
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 比较右美托咪定或咪达唑仑加入0.375%左旋布比卡因用于超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞效果。方法 选择2014年1月至2016年12月皖北煤电集团总医院行前臂或手部手术的ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级患者120例,随机分为3组,每组40例。左旋布比卡因组(L组)接受0.375%左旋布比卡因30 mL,左旋布比卡因+咪达唑仑组(LM组)接受0.375%左旋布比卡因30 mL+咪达唑仑(50 μg/kg),左旋布比卡因+右美托咪定组(LD组)接受0.375%左旋布比卡因30 mL+右美托咪定(1 μg/kg)。评估痛觉和运动阻滞起效时间、痛觉和运动阻滞维持时间、镇痛时间以及不良反应。结果 3组患者的痛觉、运动阻滞起效时间、维持时间、镇痛时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与L组相比,LM组和LD组痛觉、运动阻滞起效时间缩短,痛觉、运动阻滞维持及镇痛时间延长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与LM组相比,LD组痛觉、运动阻滞起效时间缩短,痛觉、运动阻滞维持及镇痛时间延长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。LM组患者的Ramsay镇静评分高于LD组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3组患者的不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 右美托咪定、咪达唑仑复合左旋布比卡因用于超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞中,能缩短痛觉、运动阻滞起效时间,延长痛觉和运动阻滞维持时间及镇痛时间。相比咪达唑仑,右美托咪定的效果更好。
英文摘要:
      Objective To assess the effectiveness of adding dexmedetomidine or midazolam to 0.375% levobupivacaine on ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block.Methods A total of 120 ASA I to Ⅱ patients with forearm and hand surgery under ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block in Wanbei Coal-Electric Group General Hospitalwere recruited in this study and randomly divided into three study groups (n=40 in each), namely, Group L, which received 30 mL 0.375% levobupivacaine, Group LM, which received 30 mL0.375% levobupivacaine with midazolam (50 μg/kg),and Group LD, which received 30 mL 0.375% levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine(1 μg/kg).The onset time, as well as the duration of sensory and motor block, the duration of analgesia and adverse events were recorded and evaluated.Results The onset time, as well as the duration of sensory and motor block, the duration of analgesia had significant difference when the groups were compared(P<0.05). The onset of sensory and motor block was significantly faster in group LM and group LD compared to that in group L, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Time of administration of rescue analgesic, duration of sensory and motor block showed significant increase in group LD in comparison with group LM which showed significant increase in comparison with group L, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The Ramsay sedation score of group LM was higher in group LM than that in group LD without statistical significance(P<0.05), however.No significant difference was observed in the incidence of the adverse events when the groups were compared(P>0.05).Conclusion dexmedetomidine and midazolam in combination with levobupivacaine in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block are effective in decreasing the onset of sensory and motor block and extending the duration of sensory and motor block and the timeto first analgesic request. In comparison with midazolam, the addition of dexmedetomidine to levobupivacaine is more effective.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭