文章摘要
双镜联合技术在胃间质瘤中的应用效果
Clinical application of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastricstromal tumors
投稿时间:2018-01-09  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2018.07.002
中文关键词: 胃间质瘤  腹腔镜  胃镜  双镜联合
英文关键词: Gastric stromal tumors  Laparoscopic surgery  Endoscopic surgery  Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery
基金项目:安徽省科技公关项目(项目编号:1401045015)
作者单位E-mail
张震 230000 合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院普外科  
李永翔 230000 合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院普外科 1874010558@qq.com 
周玉良 230000 合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院普外科  
摘要点击次数: 2266
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨双镜联合技术治疗胃间质瘤的安全性和有效性。方法 回顾性分析2014年1月至2016年6月安徽医科大学第一附属医院治疗的胃间质瘤患者136例临床资料,其中采用双镜联合治疗患者44例、单纯胃镜治疗患者42例、单纯腹腔镜治疗患者50例。比较3种治疗方式的手术时间、术中出血量、术后胃肠道功能恢复时间、术后下床活动时间、术后住院时间,以及术后并发症发生率和肿瘤复发情况。结果 所有患者均手术顺利,无术后死亡病例,所有患者术后随访均未见复发。双镜联合组操作时间、术中出血量、术后胃肠道功能恢复时间、术后下床活动时间、术后住院时间均短于或少于单纯腹腔镜组(P<0.05),单纯胃镜组肿瘤直径、操作时间、术后胃肠道功能恢复时间、术后下床活动时间、术后住院时间均短于或少于单纯腹腔镜组(P<0.05)。结论 对于直径较小的胃间质瘤,单纯胃镜切除是最佳方案。双镜联合技术更适合治疗直径在10 cm以内较大的胃间质瘤,其操作安全可行,且具有定位准确,创伤小、术后恢复快的特点,近期疗效令人满意,但其远期疗效仍需进一步随访。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of application of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery to the treatment of gastric stromal tumors(GSTs). Methods The clinical data were analyzed for 136 surgical patients with gastric stromal tumor from Jan 2014 to June 2016. Among them, 44 patients underwent laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery(combination group), 42 patients underwent gastroscopy(endoscopy group) while another 50 patients laparoscopy alone (laparoscopy group). The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative recovery time, gastrointestinal function, postoperative ambulation time and postoperative hospital stay, complications and recurrence after operation were compared between different groups. Results The therapies were completed successfully without death, and no recurrence or metastasis was found during the follow-up. The operation time, blood loss, recovery time of gastrointestinal function, time of ambulation and postoperative hospitalization were significantly shorter or less in the combination group than those in the laparoscopy group (P<0.05); the diameter of tumor, operation time, recovery time of gastrointestinal function, time of ambulation and postoperative hospitalization were significantly less or shorter in the endoscopy group than those in the laparoscopy group (P<0.05). Conclusion Application of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery is more suitable for gastric stromal tumors with diameter range of 10 cm, which is safe and feasible due to less trauma and faster postoperative recovery. As for patients with small tumors, the endoscopy surgery has better effect. However, long-term effect of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery still needs further study.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭