| Objective To study the impact of new labor standards on childbirth and on maternal, maternal and neonatal illness.s Methods Retrospective analysis of 800 women who gave birth at Fuling Central Hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 were divided into observation group and control group according to the standard of labor used. The observation group selected 400 women who performed new labor standards. The group selected 400 women who performed the old labor standard. Observed and compared the maternal labor process (production latency, first labor, second labor, third labor), maternal complications (postpartum hemorrhage, wound infection, perineal laceration, puerperal morbidity) and the cause of cesarean section and cesarean section rate, neonatal situation (the incidence of fetal distress, the incidence of neonatal asphyxia, Apgar score). Results The latency, first labor, and second stage of labor in the observation group were longer than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the third stage and the control group (P>0.05). The postpartum hemorrhage rate, puerperal morbidity rate, and cesarean section rate were lower than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of incision infection and perineal laceration in the observation group was not statistically significant (P<0.05). P>0.05); There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of fetal distress, neonatal asphyxia, and Apgar score in the observation group compared with the control group (P>0.05).Conclusion Compared with the old labor standard, the new labor standard can relax the labor time limit, which is more conducive to maternal adaptation, can significantly reduce the cesarean section rate, and will not increase the maternal and neonatal disease, has high clinical application value, and is worth Application promotion. |
