文章摘要
舒适化浅镇静策略应用于食管癌术后机械通气患者的效果评价
Effectevaluation of comfort shallow sedative strategy in postoperative esophagus cancer patients with mechanical ventilation
投稿时间:2018-05-11  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2018.12.013
中文关键词: 食管癌术后  机械通气  舒适化浅镇静
英文关键词: Postoperative esophagus cancer  Mechanical ventilation  Comfort shallow sedative
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
王晓兵 230001 合肥 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区(安徽省肿瘤医院)重症医学科  
张湛 230001 合肥 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区(安徽省肿瘤医院)重症医学科  
王佩双 230001 合肥 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区(安徽省肿瘤医院)重症医学科  
凌萌 230001 合肥 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区(安徽省肿瘤医院)重症医学科  
张琳琳 230001 合肥 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院西区(安徽省肿瘤医院)重症医学科 zhanglinlinlqy@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 1417
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 观察舒适化浅镇静策略应用于食管癌术后机械通气患者的效果。方法 采用前瞻性随机对照研究方法,选择安徽省肿瘤医院重症医学科2017年1月至2018年4月收治的食管癌术后机械通气患者200例,按照入科顺序进行编号,采用随机数字表法将患者分为观察组与对照组,每组100例。观察组患者使用舒适化浅镇静策略操作流程,对照组患者使用常规镇痛镇静药物(舒芬太尼、丙泊酚、右美托咪定)进行治疗,比较两组患者镇静药物用量、镇静评分、机械通气时间、ICU入住时间、意外拔管发生率、谵妄发生率及转出后1个月内定向力障碍的发生率。结果 观察组患者的镇静药物丙泊酚用量为(5 652.00±526.45)mg、右美托咪啶用量为(1 640.50±387.22)μg、机械通气时间为(4.56±0.77)d、ICU住院时间为(5.98±0.89)d,均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者Ramsay评分为(3.32±0.55)分、RASS评分为(-1.32±0.85)分,更接近镇静目标,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者谵妄发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者的意外拔管发生率、定向力障碍发生率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 应用舒适化浅镇静策略在食管癌术后机械通气患者中可以降低镇静药物用量,缩短机械通气时间和ICU入住时间,降低谵妄发生率,值得临床进一步推广。
英文摘要:
      Objective To observe the effect of comfort shallow sedative strategy in postoperative esophagus cancer patients with mechanical ventilation. Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was used, altogether 200 postoperative esophagus cancer patients with mechanical ventilation in ICU of Anhui Provincial Cancer Hospital from January 2017 to April 2018were recruited in the study. According to the order of entering ICU time, patients were divided into two groups by random digits table method, with 100 patients in each group. Patients in observation group established comfort shallow sedative strategy operational procedures and those in control group received conventional drug sedation and analgesia treatment (sufentanil,disoprofol,dexmedotomidine).Then the dosage of sedation drugs, the Ramsay score and the RASS score, the time of mechanical ventilation, the ICU time, the incidence of unplanned extubation, incidence of delirium and incidence of orientation obstacle in a month out of ICU between two groups were compared and analysed. Results The dosage of sedation drugs in observation group was:disoprofol (5 652.00±526.45) mg, dexmedotomidine (1 640.50±387.22) μg, the mechanical ventilation time was (4.56±0.77) d and the ICU time was(5.98±0.89) d, which were all lower than those in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The Ramsay score (3.32±0.55)s and the RASS score (-1.32±0.85)s in observation group were closer to the sedation goal, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of delirium in observation group was lower than that in control, and the differencewas statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of unplanned extubation and the disorientation in a month out of ICU between the two groups had no statistical difference (P>0.05). Conclusion The application ofcomfort shallow sedative strategy in postoperative esophagus cancer patients with mechanical ventilation could effectively reduce the dosage of sedatives, shorten the mechanical ventilation and the ICU time,and reduce the incidence of delirium, which is worthy of further clinical popularization and application.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭