文章摘要
HSP60和TK1在宫颈癌中的表达
Expression of HSP60 and TK1 in cervical cancer tissues
投稿时间:2019-08-16  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2021.03.007
中文关键词: 热休克蛋白60  胸苷激酶1  宫颈癌  生存期  相关性
英文关键词: Heat shock protein 60  Thymidine kinase 1  Cervical cancer  Survival  Correlation
基金项目:
作者单位
曾琛 463000 河南省驻马店市中心医院肿瘤内一科 
杨光华 463000 河南省驻马店市中心医院肿瘤内一科 
向森 463000 河南省驻马店市中心医院肿瘤内一科 
赵富丽 463000 河南省驻马店市中心医院肿瘤内一科 
摘要点击次数: 1178
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 分析热休克蛋白60(HSP60)和胸苷激酶1(TK1)在宫颈癌组织、宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)组织、宫颈正常组织中的表达情况。方法 选取2013年5月至2014年5月驻马店市中心医院收集的宫颈癌患者42例(宫颈癌组)、CIN患者40例(CIN组)、正常宫颈组织健康体检者40例(正常宫颈组)为研究对象。采用SP免疫组化方法检测各组HSP60及TK1蛋白表达情况(以光密度表示),分析3组间HSP60、TK1表达的差异。随访1~72个月,以宫颈癌HSP60蛋白表达中位水平3.48为分界点,分为2个亚组(HSP60≤3.48组、HSP60>3.48组),以宫颈癌TK1蛋白表达中位水平3.60为分界点,分为2个亚组(TK1≤3.60组、TK1>3.60组),记录不同亚组的5年生存率。按照是否复发分为复发组与未复发组,采用COX回归分析影响宫颈癌患者预后的危险因素。采用Pearson相关性分析探讨HSP60与TK1的相关性。结果 宫颈癌组HSP60和TK1蛋白表达水平均高于CIN组、正常宫颈组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);不同宫颈癌分化程度、FIGO分期、浸润深度、淋巴结转移方面HSP60和TK1蛋白表达差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),不同年龄及病理类型表达差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。HSP60光密度值≤3.48组5年生存率为85.71%,HSP60光密度值>3.48组5年生存率为61.90%(P<0.05);TK1光密度值≤3.60组5年生存率为90.48%,TK1光密度值>3.60组5年生存率为57.14%(P<0.05)。COX回归分析,浸润深度>1/2间质、淋巴结转移、HSP60光密度值>3.48、TK1光密度值>3.60是影响宫颈癌预后的独立危险因素(P<0.05);经Pearson相关性分析,宫颈癌HSP60与TK1表达水平无明显相关性(r=0.058,P>0.05)。结论 HSP60和TK1蛋白在宫颈癌组织中表达上调,且两者水平变化还会影响宫颈癌患者预后。
英文摘要:
      Objective To analyze the expression of heat shock protein 60 (HSP60) and thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) in cervical cancer tissues, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) tissues and normal cervical tissues. Methods A total of 42 patients with cervical cancer (cervical cancer group), 40 patients with CIN (CIN group), and 40 healthy individuals (normal cervix group) were selected from Zhumadian Central Hospital between May 2013 and May 2014. The expression of HSP60 and TK1 protein in each group was detected by SP immunohistochemical method (expressed as optical density). The expression of HSP60 and TK1 in the three groups was compared. 1~72 months of follow-up was conducted. With the median expression level of HSP60 protein in cervical cancer tissue (3.48) as the cut-off point, the patients were divided into two subgroups (HSP60 < 3.48 group, HSP60 > 3.48 group). With the median expression level of TKI protein in cervical cancer tissue (3.60) as the cut-off point, the patients were divided into two subgroups (TK1<3.60 group, TKI>3.60 group). The 5-year survival rates of different subgroups were recorded. According to the presence or absence of recurrence, they were divided into recurrence group and non-recurrence group. Risk factors affecting the prognosis of cervical cancer patients were screened by COX regression analysis. The correlation between HSP60 and TKI was discussed through Pearson correlation analysis. Results The expression levels of HSP60 and TKI protein in cervical cancer group were higher than those in CIN group and normal cervix group (P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the expression of HSP60 and TKI proteins between cervical cancer patients with different differentiation degrees, FIGO staging, invasion depth and lymph node metastasis (P<0.05), but there were no statistically significant differences between cervical cancer patients of different age and pathological types (P>0.05). The 5-year survival rates of HSP60 <3.48 group, HSP60 >3.48 group, TK1<3.60 group, and TKI>3.60 group were 85.71%, 61.90%, 90.48% and 57.14%, respectively (P<0.05). COX regression analysis found that infiltration depth more than 1/2 of the mesenchyme, lymph node metastasis, optical density of HSP60 higher than 3.48, and optical densityTK1 higher than 3.60 were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of cervical cancer (P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was no significant correlation between HSP60 and TK1 (r=0.058, P>0.05). Conclusions The expression of HSP60 and TKI protein is up-regulated in cervical cancer tissues, and their changes will affect the prognosis of patients with cervical cancer.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭