文章摘要
胎儿脐动脉及大脑中动脉血流动力学指标预测胎儿窘迫的价值
Value of hemodynamic indexes of fetal umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery in predicting fetal distress
投稿时间:2021-05-31  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2022.01.004
中文关键词: 胎儿窘迫  脐动脉  大脑中动脉  血流动力学
英文关键词: Fetal distress  Umbilical artery  Middle cerebral artery  Hemodynamics
基金项目:安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(项目编号:1808085MH231)
作者单位
詹学婷 242000 安徽宣城 宣城市人民医院超声诊断科 
李滟 242000 安徽宣城 宣城市人民医院超声诊断科 
李雅妮 242000 安徽宣城 宣城市人民医院超声诊断科 
何花 242000 安徽宣城 宣城市人民医院超声诊断科 
摘要点击次数: 1357
全文下载次数: 597
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨胎儿脐动脉(UA)及大脑中动脉(MCA)血流动力学指标预测胎儿窘迫的价值。方法 选取2018年6月至2020年6月宣城市人民医院收治的76例发生胎儿窘迫的孕妇设为观察组,另选取同期68名健康胎儿孕妇作为对照组。比较两组孕妇孕32~41周的UA及MCA的血流阻力指数(RI)、搏动指数(PI)、收缩期峰值流速与舒张末期血流速度的比值(S/D)及MCA与UA的RI比值(RIMCA/UA)、MCA与UA的PI比值(PIMCA/UA)和MCA与UA的S/D比值(S/DMCA/UA),采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析RIMCA/UA、PIMCA/UA和S/DMCA/UA预测胎儿窘迫的价值。结果 观察组UA的RI、PI和S/D均高于对照组(t=14.799、8.036、10.285,P均<0.001);观察组MCA的RI、PI和S/D均低于对照组(t=9.742、11.086、9.327,P均<0.001);观察组RIMCA/UA、PIMCA/UA和S/DMCA/UA均低于对照组(t=16.119、15.981、23.221,P均<0.001);RIMCA/UA、PIMCA/UA和S/DMCA/UA预测胎儿窘迫的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.937、0.841、0.846。结论 宫内窘迫胎儿UA及MCA血流动力学参数均发生异常变化,RIMCA/UA、PIMCA/UA和S/DMCA/UA预测胎儿窘迫具有重要价值。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the value of fetal umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery hemodynamics indexesin predicting fetal distress.Methods Seventy six pregnant women with fetal distress who were admitted to the Xuancheng People's Hospital from June 2018 to June 2020 were selected as the observation group, and 68 pregnant women with healthy fetuses during the same period were selected as the control group. The blood flow resistance index (RI), pulsatility index (PI), peak systolic flow velocity and end-diastolic blood flow velocity ratio (S/D), and RI ratio between MCA and UA (RIMCA/UA), PI ratio between MCA and UA (PIMCA/UA), and S/D ratio between MCA and UA (S/DMCA/UA) at 32 to 41 weeks of gestation were compared, the receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to analyze the value of RIMCA/UA, PIMCA/UAand S/DMCA/UAin predicting fetal distress.Results RI(0.86±0.13), PI(1.05±0.14), S/D(2.59±0.34) of UA in the observation group were higher than those in the control group[RI(0.59±0.08), PI(0.88±0.11), S/D(2.03±0.31)](RI:t=14.799, P<0.001, PI:t=8.036, P<0.001, S/D:t=10.285, P<0.001). The RI(0.62±0.09), PI(1.19±0.12), S/D(3.85±0.53) of MCA in the observation group were lower than those in the control group[RI(0.80±0.13), PI(1.47±0.18), S/D(4.76±0.64)](RI:t=9.742, P<0.001, PI:t=11.086, P<0.001, S/D:t=9.327, P<0.001). The RIMCA/UA(0.69±0.11), PIMCA/UA(1.16±0.13), S/DMCA/UA(1.45±0.17) in the observation group were lower than those in the control group[RIMCA/UA(1.15±0.22), PIMCA/UA(1.62±0.21), S/DMCA/UA(2.27±0.25)](RIMCA/UA:t=16.119, P<0.001, PIMCA/UA:t=15.981, P<0.001, S/DMCA/UA:t=23.221, P<0.001).The area under curve (AUC) of RIMCA/UA, PIMCA/UAand S/DMCA/UA to assess fetal distress was 0.937, 0.841, 0.846, respectively.Conclusions The hemodynamic parameters of UA and MCA of the fetus with intrauterine distress have abnormal changes, and RIMCA/UA, PIMCA/UAand S/DMCA/UA have important value in theprediction of fetal distress.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭