文章摘要
后路椎间盘镜下有限减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效及其影响因素分析
Effects and influencing factors of limited decompression with rear route diskoscope in treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
投稿时间:2016-02-12  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2016.08.011
中文关键词: 内窥镜检查|腰椎管狭窄症|减压治疗
英文关键词: Endoscopy|Lumbar spinal stenosis|Decompression treatment
基金项目:
作者单位
王磊 710077 陕西西安 西安医学院第一附属医院骨科 
赵晓光 710077 陕西西安 西安医学院第一附属医院骨科 
孙甫 710077 陕西西安 西安医学院第一附属医院骨科 
周永新 710077 陕西西安 西安医学院第一附属医院骨科 
摘要点击次数: 1523
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨后路椎间盘镜下有限减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效及其影响因素。方法 选取西安医学院第一附属医院2010年4月至2015年4月收治的80例老年腰椎管狭窄症患者,随机分为开放治疗组和椎间盘镜下治疗组各40例。比较两组患者的出血量、Nakai评分、手术时间以及术后住院时间等指标。结果 开放治疗组的手术时间、出血量、术后住院时间均多于椎间盘镜下治疗组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。开放组的优良率为77.5%(31/40)略高于椎间盘镜下治疗组的70%(28/40),但差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.581,P=0.446)。步行距离、并发症以及术前JOA评分等为影响手术疗效的相关因素。结论 后路椎间盘镜下有限减压治疗与常规开放性手术治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症患者具有相当的临床疗效,但后路椎间盘镜下的有限减压治疗的手术时间、出血量及住院时间较开放治疗组少;其影响因素主要为步行距离、术前JOA评分以及术后并发症等。
英文摘要:
      Objective To analyze the efficacy and its influencing factors of limited decompression with rear route diskoscope in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods Eighty senile patients with lumbar spinal stenosis ever treated in our hospital from Apr 2010 to Apr 2015 were collected and randomly divided into the open treatment group and the diskoscope treatment group, 40 cases in each group. The blood loss, Nakai score, operation time and hospitalization time between the two groups were compared. Results The operation time and hospitalization time in the open treatment group were much longer, and the blood loss was much higher than those in the diskoscope treatment group, with significant differences between them (P<0.05). The excellent and good rate of the open treatment group was 77.5%, which was slightly higher than that of the diskoscope treatment group (70%), but there was no significant difference (χ2=0.581, P=0.446). The influencing factors of surgical outcome were walking distance, complications, and preoperative JOA scores. Conclusion In the senile patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, the treatment of limited decompression with rear route diskoscope shows equivalent clinical efficacy to the conventional open surgery, but its operation time and hospitalization time are much shorter and its blood loss is much lower, and its main influencing factors are walking distance, preoperative JOA scores, and postoperative complications.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭