文章摘要
2种内固定术式治疗高龄股骨粗隆间Evans-Jensen IV~V型骨折疗效及安全性比较
Clinical effects and safety comparison of two kinds of internal fixation scheme in treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures for Evans-Jensen IV~V type
投稿时间:2016-12-07  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2017.09.016
中文关键词: 股骨近端锁定钢板  股骨近端防旋髓内钉  股骨粗隆间骨折  Evans-Jensen分型
英文关键词: Proximal femoral locking compression plate  Proximal femoral nail antirotation  femoral intertrochanteric fractures  Evans-Jensen type
基金项目:
作者单位
张彪 230000 合肥 安徽省第二人民医院骨科 
余润泽 230000 合肥 安徽省第二人民医院骨科 
陶学顺 230000 合肥 安徽省第二人民医院骨科 
喻德富 230000 合肥 安徽省第二人民医院骨科 
章杰斌 230000 合肥 安徽省第二人民医院骨科 
孔荣 230000 合肥 安徽省第二人民医院骨科 
摘要点击次数: 1850
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 比较股骨近端锁定钢板(PF-LCP)与股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)术式治疗高龄股骨粗隆间Evans-Jensen IV~V型骨折疗效及安全性。方法 选取2013年9月至2015年9月安徽省第二人民医院收治的高龄股骨粗隆间Evans-Jensen IV~V型骨折患者60例,采用随机数字表法分为PF-LCP组(30例)和PFNA组(30例),比较两组患者手术用时、术中失血量、骨折愈合时间、住院时间、髋关节功能恢复优良率,术后Harris评分及并发症发生情况等。结果 PFNA组患者手术用时、术中失血量均优于PF-LCP组(P<0.05);两组患者骨折愈合时间和住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);PFNA组患者髋关节功能恢复优良率高于PF-LCP组(P<0.05);PFNA组患者术后1、6及12个月Harris评分均高于PF-LCP组(P<0.05);同时PFNA组患者术后并发症发生率低于PF-LCP组(P<0.05)。结论 PFNA术式用于高龄股骨粗隆间Evans-Jensen IV~V型骨折患者治疗,具有操作简便、微创、术后关节功能恢复效果佳及并发症风险低等优势,临床价值优于PF-LCP术式。
英文摘要:
      Objective To compare the clinical effects and safety of PF-LCP and PFNA in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures for Evans-Jensen IV~V type. Methods From Sep 2013 to Sep 2015, 60 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures in our hospital for Evans-Jensen IV~V type were chosen and randomly divided into two groups, including PF-LCP group (30 patients) with PF-LCP and PFNA group (30 patients) with PFNA; and the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, hospital staying time, the excellent and good rate of hip function recovery, postoperative Harris score and the complications incidence after operation of both groups were compared. Results The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of PFNA group were significantly better than those of PF-LCP group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in fracture healing time and hospital staying time between the two groups(P>0.05).The excellent and good rates of hip function recovery of PFNA group were significantly higher than those of PF-LCP group(P<0.05). The Harris scores 1, 6, 12 months after operation of PFNA group were significantly higher than those PF-LCP group(P<0.05). The complication incidence after operation of PFNA group was significantly lower than that of PF-LCP group(P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with PF-LCP, PFNA in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures for[13]ALBERS J J, SLEE A, FLEG J L, et al.Relationship of baseline HDL subclasses, small dense LDL and LDL triglyceride to cardiovascular events in the AIM-HIGH clinical trial[J]. Atherosclerosis,2016, 251:454-459.[14]WU G H, KONG F Z, DONG X F, et al. Association between hyperhomocysteinemia and stroke with atherosclerosis and small artery occlusion depends on homocysteine metabolism-related vitamin levels in Chinese patients with normal renal function[J]. Metab Brain Dis, 2017, 32(3):859-865.[15]YE Z, ZHANG Z, ZHANG H, et al. Prognostic value of c-reactive protein and homocysteine in large-artery atherosclerotic stroke:a prospective observational study[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2017, 26(3):618-626. (2017-03-28收稿)Evans-Jensen IV~V type possess the advantages of being simple to operation, minimally invasive, and having better postoperative recovery effects of joint function and lower complications risk.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭