文章摘要
经直肠超声引导下8+X点与6点穿刺活检法诊断前列腺癌的临床价值比较
Comparison of diagnostic value using transrectal ultrasound guided by 8+X biopsy versus 6 points on prostate cancer
投稿时间:2017-04-18  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2017.12.006
中文关键词: 经直肠超声  前列腺癌  诊断价值
英文关键词: Transrectal ultrasonography  Prostate cancer  Diagnostic value
基金项目:
作者单位
冯慧俊 241001 安徽芜湖 皖南医学院弋矶山医院超声医学科 
朱慧玲 241001 安徽省芜湖市中医院超声医学科 
朱向明 241001 安徽芜湖 皖南医学院弋矶山医院超声医学科 
李国杰 241001 安徽芜湖 皖南医学院弋矶山医院超声医学科 
江峰 241001 安徽芜湖 皖南医学院弋矶山医院超声医学科 
彭辉 241001 安徽芜湖 皖南医学院弋矶山医院感染管理科 
摘要点击次数: 1768
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下8+X点及6点穿刺活检法诊断前列腺癌(Pca)的临床价值。方法 选择2014年6月至2016年5月皖南医学院弋矶山医院265例临床疑似Pca患者,即满足直肠指检阳性、前列腺特异性抗原升高、TRUS发现可疑结节、磁共振发现异常结节其中至少1项者,行TRUS引导下6点及8+X点穿刺活检,比较2种方法诊断价值。结果 8+X点穿刺活检法对Pca诊断的灵敏度为97.04%,显著高于6点穿刺法(80.74%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=18.15,P<0.001)。结论 TRUS引导下8+X点前列腺穿刺活检法诊断Pca灵敏度更高,值得临床推广。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the diagnostic value of two methods of transrectal ultrasound(TRUS) guided by 6 points and 8+X point prostate biopsy in prostate cancer (Pca).Methods A total of 265 cases who met one of these criteria (positive rectal examination; prostate specific antigen rising; TRUS finding suspicious nodules; MRI finding abnormal nodules) were examined by 6 points and 8+X systematic biopsy from June 2014 to May 2016 in our hospital. The diagnostic value of these two methods was compared.Results The diagnosis sensitivity of prostate cancer by 8+X method was 97.04%, which was higher than the sensitivity by using 6 points method(80.74%) (χ2=18.15, P<0.001).Conclusion TRUS guided by 8 + X prostate biopsy plays an important role in the diagnosis of Pca, with a high sensitivity, which is worth popularizing in clinical application.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭