文章摘要
尿促性素促排卵在卵巢功能正常的不孕患者首次行IVF-ET助孕中的价值
Effect of ovarian stimulation with HMG in IVF-ET cycle for young patients with normal ovarian function
投稿时间:2019-03-13  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2020.05.002
中文关键词: 尿促性素  促排卵  体外受精  胚胎移植  妊娠结局
英文关键词: Human menopausal gonadotropin  Ovarian stimulation  In vitro fertilization  Embryo transfer  Pregnancy outcomes
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年基金(项目编号:81601345)
作者单位E-mail
纪冬梅 230022 合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科生殖医学中心  
邹薇薇 230022 合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科生殖医学中心  
邓晓红 230022 合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科生殖医学中心  
李欣媛 230022 合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科生殖医学中心  
陈蓓丽 230022 合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科生殖医学中心  
章志国 230022 合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科生殖医学中心  
周平 230022 合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科生殖医学中心  
魏兆莲 230022 合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科生殖医学中心  
曹云霞 230022 合肥 安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科生殖医学中心 caoyunxia6@126.com 
摘要点击次数: 1867
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨尿促性素(HMG)作为促性腺激素(Gn)的促排卵方案在卵巢功能正常的不孕症患者首次行体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)助孕治疗中的价值。方法 回顾性分析2014年8月至2018年4月在安徽医科大学第一附属医院妇产科生殖医学中心首次行IVF-ET的卵巢功能正常患者共147例,按促排卵方案不同分为两组,其中63例采用HMG结合氯米芬/来曲唑促排,设为HMG组;另84例采用我中心传统的长效促性腺激素释放激素类似物(GnRHa)降调节加重组促卵泡素(rFSH)促排卵,设为rFSH组。取卵术后一年对两组患者的促排卵情况、胚胎发育情况、临床结局以及两种Gn促排卵的性价比进行比较。结果 ①rFSH组的Gn使用总量[(2 038.4±505.02)IU比(1 717.3±656.16)IU]、使用时间[(11.6±2.12)天比(9.67±3.24)天]和总费用[(7 555.6±1871.94)元比(526.63±201.22)元]均高于HMG组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②HMG组平均获卵数(12.43±7.07)枚,少于rFSH组的(14.94±7.57)枚,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组卵子成熟率、受精率、卵裂率以及囊胚形成率等差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。③两组新鲜移植妊娠率、流产率、解冻移植累积妊娠率、流产率以及总累积活产/继续妊娠率等比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 对于卵巢功能正常且首次行IVF-ET助孕的不孕患者,采用国产HMG替代进口rFSH促排卵行IVF治疗可获得较好的临床妊娠率与活产率,还能缩短治疗时间、降低治疗成本,值得推广使用。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the application value of ovarian stimulation with HMG as gonadotropin (Gn) in their first in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycle for patients with normal ovarian function. Methods From August 2014 to April 2018, a total of 147 patients with normal ovarian function who underwent their fisrt IVF-ET cycle in Center of Reproductive Medicine, and whose age was no more than 35 years old and BMI no more than 25 were selected. Of which, 63 patients were treated with the combination of HMG, clomiphene and/or letrozole, set as HMG group. The other 84 cases with traditional GnRHa down-regulation and recombinant follicular stimulating hormone (rFSH) were used for ovarian stimulation in the Reproductive center of 1st Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, which was set as rFSH group. Oocytes collected, embryo development, clinical outcomes and cost of Gn were compared between the two groups after one year of oocyte retrieval. Results (1) The total dose (2 038.4±505.02 vs 1 717.3±656.16) IU, duration(11.6±2.12 vs 9.67±3.24) days, and total cost (7 555.6±1871.94 vs 526.63±201.22) yuan of Gn in rFSH group were significantly higher than those of the HMG group (P<0.05). The average number of oocytes obtained in HMG group was less than in rFSH group(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in egg maturation rate, fertilization rate, cleavage rate and blastocyst formation rate (P>0.05). (3) There was no significant difference in fresh transplantation pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, cumulative FET pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate of FET cycle and total live birth/continued pregnancy rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions For patients with normal ovarian function and first-time IVF-ET, the use of domestic HMG instead of imported rFSH for ovarian stimulation could achieve satisfactory clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate, and can also reduce treatment costs significantly.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭