文章摘要
乳腺癌改良根治术中保留肋间臂神经对患者术后患侧上肢功能及生活质量的影响
Impact of preserving the intercostobrachial nerve during modified radical mastectomy on postoperative upper limb function and quality of life in breast cancer patients
投稿时间:2025-08-29  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2026.04.002
中文关键词: 乳腺癌改良根治术  肋间臂神经  上肢功能  生活质量
英文关键词: Modified radical mastectomy  Intercostobrachial nerve  Upper limb function  Quality of life
基金项目:安徽省高等学校自然科学重点项目(编号:2024AH051277),安徽省卫生健康重点项目(编号:2023-15)
作者单位E-mail
汪进城 233000 安徽蚌埠 蚌埠医科大学第二附属医院肿瘤外科  
王畏 233000 安徽蚌埠 蚌埠医科大学第二附属医院肿瘤外科  
王广辉 233000 安徽蚌埠 蚌埠医科大学第二附属医院肿瘤外科  
张杰 233000 安徽蚌埠 蚌埠医科大学第二附属医院肿瘤外科  
贾建光 233000 安徽蚌埠 蚌埠医科大学第二附属医院肿瘤外科 jiajianguang1978@126.com 
摘要点击次数: 1673
全文下载次数: 131
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨在乳腺癌改良根治术中,保留肋间臂神经(ICBN)对患者术后患侧上肢功能及生活质量的影响。方法 回顾性分析2022年5月至2024年2月在蚌埠医科大学第二附属医院肿瘤外科收治的74例行乳腺癌改良根治术女性患者资料,根据是否保留ICBN分为观察组(保留ICBN)和对照组(切除ICBN),各37例。统计两组一般资料,并比较两组围手术期指标、术后患侧上肢运动功能和感觉异常变化、术后并发症发生情况及对术后生活质量的影响。结果 两组患者在年龄、身体质量指数(BMI)、病灶直径、病灶位置、手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、术后腋窝引流管拔除时间、术后住院时间、住院总费用方面比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1、3、6个月,两组患侧上肢运动功能均弱于本组术前(P<0.05);术后1年,观察组患侧上肢的运动功能和术前相比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),对照组上肢的运动功能仍然弱于术前(P<0.05);观察组术后患侧上肢运动功能同时间段对比均强于对照组(P<0.05);不同手术方式和时间对患者术后患侧上肢功能的互相影响存在交互作用(P<0.05)。广义估计方程显示,术后两组感觉异常发生率均随时间递减(P<0.05);观察组的感觉异常发生率同时间段对比均低于对照组(P<0.05)。两组术后总并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组术后不同时间点生活质量各维度评分均高于对照组(P<0.05),术后生活质量评分受到不同手术方式和时间的交互作用影响(P<0.05)。结论 在乳腺癌改良根治术中保留ICBN安全可行,能有效促进上肢功能恢复,显著缩短患者社会功能恢复时间,改善患者术后多维生活质量。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the effect of preserving the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) during modified radical mastectomy on postoperative upper limb function and quality of life in breast cancer patients. Methods A total of 74 female patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer at the Department of Surgical Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University, from May 2022 to February 2024 were enrolled. Based on whether the ICBN was preserved, patients were divided into an observation group (ICBN preserved) and a control group (ICBN resected), with 37 cases in each group. General data were collected, and perioperative indicators, changes in postoperative upper limb motor function and sensory abnormalities, postoperative complications, and impacts on postoperative quality of life were compared between the two groups. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, body mass index (BMI), tumor diameter, tumor location, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes dissected, postoperative drainage tube removal time, postoperative hospital stay, or total hospitalization costs (P>0.05). 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, upper limb motor function on the affected side was significantly weaker than preoperative levels in both groups (P<0.05). One year postoperatively, upper limb motor function in the observation group showed no statistically significant difference compared with preoperative levels (P>0.05), while that in the control group remained significantly weaker than preoperative levels (P<0.05). The observation group demonstrated significantly better upper limb motor function on the affected side than the control group at all corresponding postoperative time points (P<0.05), and there was a significant interaction between surgical approach and time on postoperative upper limb function (P<0.05). Generalized estimating equations revealed that the incidence of sensory abnormalities decreased over time in both groups (P<0.05), and the observation group had significantly lower incidence rates than the control group at all corresponding postoperative time points (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). At different postoperative time points, the scores for each dimension of quality of life in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05), and there was a significant interaction between surgical approach and time on postoperative quality of life scores (P<0.05). Conclusion Preservation of the ICBN during modified radical mastectomy is safe and feasible, which effectively promotes the recovery of upper limb function, significantly shortens the time to recovery of social function, and improves multidimensional postoperative quality of life in patients with breast cancer.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭