文章摘要
hs-CRP与ALB比值EOS D-D与AECOPD病情严重程度的相关性及预后分析
Correlation analysis of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, eosinophils, D-dimer with severity and prognosis of AECOPD
投稿时间:2025-03-18  
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2026.05.008
中文关键词: 慢性阻塞性肺疾病  急性加重期  超敏C反应蛋白  清蛋白  嗜酸粒细胞  D-二聚体
英文关键词: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease  acute exacerbation  high-sensitivity C-reactive protein  albumin  eosinophils  D-dimer
基金项目:
作者单位
孙洪岩 230012 安徽合肥 安徽省第二人民医院呼吸内科 
宫亚娅 230012 安徽合肥 安徽省第二人民医院呼吸内科 
齐保龙 230012 安徽合肥 安徽省第二人民医院呼吸内科 
摘要点击次数: 1224
全文下载次数: 109
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)与清蛋白(ALB)的比值(HCAR)、嗜酸粒细胞(EOS)、D-二聚体(D-D)的表达与慢阻肺急性加重(AECOPD)病情严重程度相关性及影响预后的危险因素。方法 选取2023年1~12月安徽省第二人民医院呼吸内科临床资料完整的249例AECOPD住院患者为研究对象,依据有无呼吸衰竭,分为呼吸衰竭组(72例)和非呼吸衰竭组(177例);采用电话随访及门诊随访的方式,持续随访1年,以1年内≥1次以上急性加重需住院治疗甚至死亡的患者为预后不良组(108例),无需住院治疗的患者为预后良好组(141例)。分析各组患者的一般临床资料和实验室检查指标,寻找AECOPD患者预后不良的危险因素。结果 呼吸衰竭组患者合并肺心病、住院天数、中性粒细胞计数、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、hs-CRP与ALB的比值(HCAR)、D-二聚体(D-D)高于非呼吸衰竭组,身体质量指数、嗜酸粒细胞(EOS)、清蛋白(ALB)低于非呼吸衰竭组(P<0.05)。预后不良组肺心病、呼吸衰竭的发生率,HCAR、D-D高于预后良好组;EOS水平低于预后良好组(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,HCAR升高、D-D升高、合并肺心病、呼吸衰竭是AECOPD预后不良的危险因素(P<0.05)。结论 AECOPD呼吸衰竭组及预后不良组患者存在HCAR、D-D高表达,EOS减少。HCAR、EOS、D-D联合检测对评估AECOPD病情严重程度及预后有较高的临床应用价值。
英文摘要:
      Objective To explore the correlation between the expression of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to albuminratio ratio(HCAR), eosinophils, D-dimer and the severity of AECOPD, as well as the risk factors affecting prognosis. Methods A total of 249 AECOPD inpatients with complete clinical data in the Hospital from January 2023 to December 2023 were selected as study subjects. Based on the presence or absence of respiratory failure, the patients were divided into the respiratory failure group(72 cases) and non-respiratory failure group(177 cases). Using telephone and outpatient follow-up methods, with a continuous follow-up of one year, patients with acute exacerbations that require hospitalization at least once or even death within one year were classified as the poor prognosis group(108 cases), while those who did not require hospitalization were classified as the good prognosis group(141 cases). The general clinical data and laboratory test indicators of patients in each group to were analyzed to identify risk factors for poor prognosis in AECOPD patients. Results Patients in the respiratory failure group had higher rates of concomitant pulmonary heart disease, longer hospital stays, higher NEU, hs-CRP, HCAR, and D-D levels than those in the non-respiratory failure group. Conversely, they had lower BMI, EOS, and ALB levels(P<0.05). The incidence of pulmonary heart disease and respiratory failure, as well as HCAR and D-D, were higher in the poor prognosis group than in the good prognosis group,the EOS level was lower than that of the group with good prognosis(P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that elevated HCAR, D-D, concomitant pulmonary heart disease, and respiratory failure were risk factors for poor prognosis in AECOPD(P<0.05). Conclusion AECOPD patients with respiratory failure and poor prognosis have high expression of HCAR and D-D, and reduced EOS. The combined detection of HCAR, EOS, and D-D has high clinical application value in evaluating the severity and prognosis of AECOPD.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭